(CN) – ETrade was not unjustly enriched by its misappropriation of another company’s trade secrets because it lost money using them, a California appeals court ruled. Ajaxo Inc. successfully sued ETrade for misappropriation of trade secrets regarding stock trading through wireless devices. A second trial took place on the issue of unjust enrichment. The jury heard evidence from Ajaxo that ETrade had earned $300 million. ETrade countered that it had lost $2 million. The trial court ruled in E*Trade’s favor, and Justice Eugene Premo of the San Jose-based Sixth California Court of Appeals agreed. He rejected Ajaxo’s argument that it should have received a royalty payment. “We conclude that where a defendant has not realized a profit or other calculable benefit as a result of his or her misappropriation of a trade secret, unjust enrichment is not provable,” Premo ruled.
Subscribe to our free newsletters
Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

