WASHINGTON (AP) — Impeachment hearings for President Donald Trump create a layer of complications for congressional lawmakers seeking agreement on $1.4 trillion worth of essential federal agency budgets and rewriting North American trade rules.
Public hearings into Trump’s actions with Ukraine promise to suck the air out of Washington and stoke the partisan flames inside the Capitol ever hotter. Yet they could be the last, best opportunity for lawmakers to wrap up their work on the budget and the trade deal.
As the House returns from a quick break, the sole piece of must-do business is to pass a government-wide stopgap spending bill to avert the second government shutdown in a year.
Avoiding a shutdown shouldn’t be a problem, for now, with passage of a temporary, government-wide spending bill to perhaps Dec. 20 virtually assured. Top leaders on Capitol Hill, however, are struggling with a full-year solution on appropriations work, where progress is overdue and the risk of being derailed entirely remains.
Most notably, recurring fights over Trump’s U.S.-Mexico border fence and immigrant detention practices are making it difficult for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to make progress on a broader, full-year $1.4 trillion spending bill. That measure is needed to implement the terms of last summer’s hard-won budget agreement, which distributed budget increases to the Pentagon and some domestic agencies.
McConnell is personally invested in a successful budget outcome and both he and Pelosi have long histories on appropriations. A meeting Tuesday among the bipartisan leadership of the Appropriations committees could produce an agreement on the stopgap measure — but efforts to smooth agreement on wall funding aren’t going nearly as well.
The other top issue is a legislative update to the North American Free Trade Agreement, which is especially sought by Trump’s Republican allies.
Pelosi is the key figure on trade, always a tricky issue for Democrats, even if the politics of the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement are not as divisive as NAFTA was 26 years ago.
Passage of NAFTA in 1993 badly split House Democrats, but Pelosi, who represents the Port of San Francisco, voted “aye,” as did Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and powerful Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass.
Neal is leading a working group on the measure and says the group is “on the 5-yard line” and the optimistic take is that he and Pelosi will bring USMCA in for a touchdown.
Some see the trade updates as an improvement over NAFTA, whose provisions enforcing Mexican labor and environmental rules are viewed as inadequate by many Democrats. The selling points for the new pact are that it updates NAFTA for the 21st century with hard-won provisions on digital trade, intellectual property, financial services and agricultural trade.
Still, any impeachment-related delays could tax patience and thrust politically freighted issues like the border wall and the Republicans’ goal of an updated U.S. trade pact with Mexico and Canada directly into the heat of the presidential primary campaigns.
On spending, Trump is a wild card as usual. He singlehandedly drove the 35-day partial shutdown that spanned the changeover between Republican and Democratic control of the House last winter. He has struggled to win much wall funding from Congress, where lawmakers in both parties have other designs for the money.
Trump has had more success in exploiting his powers to siphon money from Pentagon anti-drug and military base construction accounts to the wall, and construction is finally beginning on some new segments he has long promised.
Trump could spin a successful wall narrative without much more in new appropriations and simply funding the government on autopilot — though hardly anyone is advocating that — would give him perhaps $6 billion more.
Trump’s anger at impeachment, his poisonous relationship with Pelosi, and his unpredictability and volatility are red flags. But the forces favoring an agreement are powerful, and McConnell — a top force behind the July budget pact — appears ready to get engaged more actively.
The odds for a spending deal could be helped by the apparent sidelining — because of impeachment — of acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and budget office chief Russell Vought, two hard-liners with whom McConnell has clashed in the past.
And there is still time for action, even if the odds get more dicey in a presidential election year.
One of the benefits of limiting the duration of the upcoming stopgap spending bill, known as a continuing resolution, is that it means another is needed before Congress adjourns for the year.
Any December stopgap measure could provide a way to ship some unfinished business on taxes, health care and pensions to Trump’s desk as part of a must-pass package. Top lawmakers hope that a full-year spending bill would serve the same purpose but acknowledge there are considerable obstacles.
“I think it would be a terrible mistake if we were still in a continuing resolution after the first of the year for a whole host of reasons,” said top Senate Appropriations Committee Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont, citing shifting signals from the White House as contributing to the delays.
“It has been difficult with the White House because … they have not always been consistent in what they want.”