Drug Testing

An at-will employee has no cause of action for common-law invasion of privacy when they consent to the collection of their urine under the “direct-observation method,” during which a same-sex monitor visually observes the employee producing the sample, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — An at-will employee has no cause of action for common-law invasion of privacy when they consent to the collection of their urine under the “direct-observation method,” during which a same-sex monitor visually observes the employee producing the sample, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled.

Categories / Appeals, Civil Rights, Employment

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Drug Testing

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads