NEWARK (CN) - A bank director sued two law schools, claiming a law review article, "Of Meat and Manhood," defamed him, saying he harassed an employee for being vegetarian, "equating vegetarianism with homosexuality."
Robert Catalanello sued Zachary A. Kramer, The Washington University School of Law, and Western New England University School of Law, in Federal Court.
Catalanello claims Kramer defamed him in an article in the Washington (University) Law Review, and in a lecture sponsored by the Western New England University law school.
Kramer is a law professor and associate dean for intellectual life at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law in Tempe, Ariz.
The article, "Of Meat and Manhood," appeared in the Washington Law Review in March 2011, according to the complaint.
Catalanello, of New Jersey, is a managing director at Credit Agricole, a European investment bank with several branches in the United States.
He claims Kramer's article falsely accused him of "sex discrimination in the form of gender stereotyping": that he had harassed a male employee at a Wall Street firm for being vegetarian.
According to the complaint: "The law review article contains false and defamatory statements of and concerning plaintiff which include, but are not limited to, the following:
"'Catalanello subjected Pacifico to a steady barrage of taunts, insults, and demeaning antics.
'The bulk of the harassment aimed to belittle Pacifico by equating vegetarianism with homosexuality.
'My interest in Pacifico's case has less to do with the particulars of his state law claim - which appears strong on its face - than with the broader implications of the discrimination he faced in the workplace ...
'... vegetarianism and sexual orientation merely served as proxies for the real reason Catalanello and others discriminated against Pacifico - he failed to conform to their idea of how a "real" man is supposed to look and act.
'... the discrimination faced by Pacifico is really sex discrimination in the form of gender stereotyping.
'...Catalanello viewed Pacifico's vegetarianism as a proxy for effeminacy.
'...Catalanello started to harass Pacifico as soon as he learned that Pacifico was vegetarian.
'For Catalanello, the easiest way to belittle Pacifico - and perhaps the most harmful way to do so in their particular workplace setting - was to call him gay. By doing so, Catalanello was relying on the stereotype, which is deeply rooted in our culture, that gay men are "fairies" and "sissies" and altogether not manly men.
'Pacifico worked on Wall Street, a stronghold of machismo culture, and Pacifico's firm seemed to fit that mold.
'On numerous occasions the firm's masculine culture revealed itself in conversations about where and what to eat.
'Knowing full well that Pacifico was vegetarian, Catalanello purposely sought to punish Pacifico by refusing to order anything but meat for work-related meals ...
'Catalanello's attitude about Pacifico's vegetarianism - that is, his animosity toward Pacifico's vegetarianism - is rooted in a gender stereotype about manliness.
'Catalanello picked on Pacifico because he thought that Pacifico did not eat what a "real" man is supposed to eat.
'According to Catalanello's worldview, a man is expected to be masculine and one way in which he should express his masculinity is by eating meat. Catalanello targeted Pacifico because he did not live up to this standard.