Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, March 28, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Court Puts Cheez-It Class Action Back on the Shelves

Reviving a federal class action over healthful branding that appears on boxes of Cheez-Its, the Second Circuit found Tuesday that the “whole grain” slogan could mislead consumers.

MANHATTAN (CN) — Reviving a federal class action over healthful branding that appears on boxes of Cheez-Its, the Second Circuit found Tuesday that the “whole grain” slogan could mislead consumers.

While Cheez-Its usually come in a package that says either “Whole Grain” or “Made with Whole Grain,” the ingredients list puts enriched white flour at the top. Because the snack contains just 5 to 8 grams of whole grain, lead plaintiffs Kristen Mantikas, Kristin Burns and Linda Castle claimed in a 2016 lawsuit that the labeling was deliberately deceptive.

U.S. District Judge Sandra Feuerstein dismissed the case last year for failure to state a claim, but a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit decided Tuesday that the case should go to trial.

“The representation that a cracker is ‘made with whole grain’ would thus plausible lead a reasonable consumer to conclude that the grain ingredient was entirely, or at least predominantly, whole grain,” U.S. Circuit Judge Pierre Leval wrote for the court.

Kellogg, which makes Cheez-Its, failed to sway the court that the cracker’s mere inclusion of at least some whole grain means that the labeling is not misleading,

“Such a rule would permit Defendant to lead consumers to believe its Cheez-Its were made of whole grain so long as the crackers contained an iota of whole grain, along with 99.999 percent white flour,” the 16-page opinion states.

Michael Reese, who represents the consumers, applauded Tuesday’s reversal.

“This is a very important decision for consumers,” Reese said in an email. “It holds you cannot promise consumers something on the front of a package, and then try to disclaim that on the back. It requires truth in labeling.”

Kenneth Lee, an attorney for Kellogg with the firm Jenner & Block, did not respond to email seeking comment.

Categories / Appeals, Consumers, Health

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...