Court OK’s Reduced Fees in Strip-Search Litigation | Courthouse News Service
Thursday, November 30, 2023
Courthouse News Service
Thursday, November 30, 2023 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Court OK’s Reduced Fees in Strip-Search Litigation

(CN) - The 2nd Circuit upheld a reduced attorney fee award of $461,000 to former detainees who claimed they were unconstitutionally strip-searched at the Schenectady County Jail. When the county settled the class action for $2.5 million, the plaintiffs sought 26 percent of that amount, or $650,000, in attorney fees.

The class members challenged the district court's decision to grant attorney fees on an hourly rate, rather than as a percentage of the settlement.

They said their attorneys spent more than 1,000 hours working on the case, which accused the county of performing strip searches on pre-trial detainees, regardless of their alleged crimes.

The county insisted that its detainees were merely "required to change into jail uniforms in the presence of a corrections officer of the same sex," and that the jail had no formal strip-searching policy.

Nonetheless, it agreed to pay the class members $2.5 million and to alter some of its practices.

The class members said they were entitled to $650,000 in attorney fees, based on a percentage of the settlement.

U.S. District Judge Gary Sharpe instead calculated fees using a modified lodestar method, basing the fees on the attorneys' normal hourly rates. He awarded class members about $461,000 -- or 13 percent of the settlement -- which included about $343,000 in attorney fees, $10,000 in costs and $107,000 in administrative expenses.

The Manhattan-based federal appeals court saw no abuse of discretion in Sharpe's decision to use the modified lodestar formula instead of a percentage approach.

"Civil rights cases may or may not raise the same danger of 'routine overcompensation' for risk that has troubled this court in the context of 'mega-fund' class actions," Judge Debra Ann Livingston wrote, "but it is because of the case-specific nature of the fee award inquiry that we have been loath to disturb the determinations of district courts in this area."

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.