Call-in Shifts

A Ninth Circuit panel reversed a judgment on an indemnification claim brought by an employee of Zumiez stories in California relating to phone expenses incurred when calling her employer for call-in shifts, finding the employee failed to include specific facts about how she made the calls and what costs she incurred.

SAN FRANCISCO – A Ninth Circuit panel reversed a judgment on an indemnification claim brought by an employee of Zumiez stores in California relating to phone expenses incurred when calling her employer for call-in shifts, finding the employee failed to include specific facts about how she made the calls and what costs she incurred.

Categories / Appeals, Business, Employment

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Call-in Shifts

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads