Attorneys, Sanctions

A California appeals court affirmed sanctions and denial of fees against an attorney whose appellate briefs accused the judge of intentionally ruling incorrectly, referred to her as "succubustic" and used the phrases "disgraceful," "pseudohermaphroditic misconduct" and "reverse peristalsis."

SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California appeals court affirmed sanctions and denial of fees against an attorney whose appellate briefs accused the judge of intentionally ruling incorrectly, referred to her as "succubustic" and used the phrases "disgraceful," "pseudohermaphroditic misconduct" and "reverse peristalsis."

Categories / Appeals, Law

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Attorneys, Sanctions

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads