Increasing reports of asymptomatic Covid-19 cases indicate that many people may not be affected by it, but also shows that apparently healthy people may be capable of spreading it.
(AP) — A flood of new research suggests that far more people have had the coronavirus without symptoms, fueling hope that it will turn out to be less lethal than originally feared — and fears that it may spread more widely.
The two sides of asymptomatic infection means it’s impossible to know who around you may be contagious. That complicates decisions about returning to work, school and normal life.
In the past week, reports of silent infections have come from a homeless shelter in Boston, a Navy aircraft carrier, pregnant women at a New York hospital, several European countries and California.
The head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says 25% of infected people might not have symptoms. The vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. John Hyten, thinks it may be as high as 60% to 70% among military personnel.
None of these numbers can be trusted because they’re based on flawed and inadequate testing, said Dr. Michael Mina of Harvard’s School of Public Health.
Collectively, though, they suggest “we have just been off the mark by huge, huge numbers” for estimating total infections, he said.
Worldwide, more than 2.3 million infections and more than 160,000 deaths have been confirmed. The virus has caused nearly unprecedented economic and social harm since its existence was reported in early January.
Based on known cases, health officials have said the virus usually causes mild or moderate flu-like illness. Now evidence is growing that a substantial number of people may have no symptoms at all.
Scientists in Iceland screened 6% of its population to see how many had undetected infections and found that only about 0.7% tested positive — 70 per 1,000. So did 13% of a group at higher risk because of recent travel or exposure to someone sick.
Aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, where one crew member died from the virus, “the rough numbers are that 40% are symptomatic,” meaning more people show no signs of illness than those who get sick, said Vice Adm. Phillip Sawyer, deputy commander of naval operations. The ratio may change if more develop symptoms later, he said.
In New York, a hospital tested all pregnant women coming in to deliver over a two-week period. Nearly 14% of those who arrived with no symptoms of coronavirus turned out to have it. Of the 33 positive cases, 29 had no symptoms when tested, although some developed them later.
Previously, tests on passengers and crew from the Diamond Princess cruise ship found nearly half who tested positive had no symptoms at the time. Researchers estimate that 18% of infected people never developed any.
These studies used tests that look for bits of the virus from throat and nose swabs, which can miss cases. Someone can test negative one day if there’s not much virus to detect and then positive the next.
Symptoms may not appear when someone is tested but turn up later. One Japanese study found more than half of those who had no symptoms when they tested positive felt sick later.
Better answers may come from newer tests that check blood for antibodies. But the accuracy of these, too, is still to be determined.
On Friday, researchers reported results from antibody tests on 3,300 people in California’s Santa Clara County: Between 1.5% and 2.8% have been infected, they said. That would mean 48,000 to 81,000 cases in the county — more than 50 times the number that have been confirmed.
The work has not been formally published or reviewed, and some scientists were quick to question it. Participants were recruited through Facebook ads, which would attract many people likely to be positive who have had symptoms and want to know if the coronavirus was the reason. Some neighborhoods had way more participants than others, and hot spots within the county might have made infections seem more common than they are elsewhere.
Ships, maternity wards and single counties do not provide data that can be used to generalize about what’s happening elsewhere. And many of the figures have come from snapshots, not research on wide populations over time.
Antibody testing in particular needs to be done in an unbiased approach on groups of people that are representative of the geographic, social, racial and other conditions, Mina said.
The CDC and other groups plan such studies, and they could guide public health advice on returning to normal life for people in some areas.
If infections are more widespread than previously understood, it’s possible that more people have developed some level of immunity to the virus. That could stifle the spread through herd immunity, but scientists caution that there is still much to learn about whether mild illnesses confer immunity and how long it might last.
It will be months before enough reliable testing has been done to answer those questions and others, including how widespread infections have been and the virus’s true mortality rate, which has only been estimated so far.
“If they’ve all seen the virus before, then maybe you can relax in that neighborhood” and ease social distancing, Mina said. However, “We’re not anywhere close where we need to be” on antibody testing to do that yet, he said.