Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 24, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Anti-Terrorism Act

In a case brought against Twitter, Google and Facebook by a Dallas police officer who was injured in a mass shooting against police officers in 2016, the Fifth Circuit ruled that internet services and social media providers cannot be held secondarily liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act for aiding and abbeting a foreign terrorist group based on acts committed by a single person in the United States.

NEW ORLEANS — In a case brought against Twitter, Google and Facebook by a Dallas police officer who was injured in a mass shooting against police officers in 2016, the Fifth Circuit ruled that internet services and social media providers cannot be held secondarily liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act for aiding and abetting a foreign terrorist group based on acts committed by a single person in the United States. 

Categories / Appeals, Civil Rights, Media

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...