(CN) - The 9th Circuit reinstated a lawsuit against T-Mobile USA on the grounds that a class-action waiver in the company's arbitration agreement is unconscionable and unenforceable under Oregon law.
Consumers allegedly had trouble inserting their wireless LAN cards into their IBM ThinkPad laptops. They called T-Mobile, with whom they'd signed a service agreement, and T-Mobile sent them refurbished cards. But the refurbished cards didn't work, either, according to the buyers.
The users filed a class action against T-Mobile and card maker Sony, alleging violations of various state and federal consumer-protection laws.
The district court dismissed the lawsuit based on the class-action waiver in the arbitration clause.
On appeal, Judge Reinhardt said the arbitration clause is substantively unconscionable because it unreasonable favors T-Mobile, the party with greater bargaining power.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.