Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Friday, April 19, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Uber v. Google

Finding that compiled due-diligence documents were not protected by attorney-client privilege, a California appeals court reversed a ruling allowing Uber to withhold them from discovery in a lawsuit accusing the ride-sharing company of stealing Google's technology.

SAN FRANCISCO -- Finding that compiled due-diligence documents were not protected by attorney-client privilege, a California appeals court on Friday reversed a ruling allowing Uber to withhold them from discovery in a lawsuit accusing the ride-sharing company of stealing Google's technology.

Categories / Appeals, Business, Law, Technology

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...