(CN) — Seven years ago, the CIA’s brutal interrogation program remained too shrouded in secrecy for human-rights physicians to confirm that the torture inside black sites involved human experimentation.
After warning of the possibility in 2010, the New York-based advocacy group Physicians for Human Rights upgraded their judgment to a matter of certainty in their scathing June report: “Nuremberg Betrayed.”
Sarah Dougherty, the paper’s lead author, explained over the phone how recent revelations from Senate investigations and federal litigation have convinced her that the CIA violated bedrock medical principles established 70 years ago.
“The relevance of the Nuremberg Code here — in the way that I use it — is that it created an an ethical bright line that you don’t try new things on prisoners,” Dougherty said. A senior fellow for the U.S. Anti-Torture Program at Physicians for Human Rights, Dougherty is a lawyer with a master’s degree in public health.
“You do not experiment on prisoners,” she added. “They are vulnerable people in captivity. They are not there to be exploited.”
Scott Allen, a physician who helped found Brown University’s Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, co-wrote the report as the group’s medical adviser.
Guiding medical ethics since May 1947, the Nuremberg Code owes its genesis to the “Doctors’ Trial” of Nazi war criminals following World War II.
Three judges from those trials — which featured Adolf Hitler’s personal physician, Karl Brandt, on the dock — culminated in the adoption of 10 points laying the foundation of well-known principles like informed consent and absence of coercion.
The point, Dougherty said, was not to invite overblown comparisons to Nazi atrocities, but to emphasize that the violations of that code do not always come on the scale and scope encountered during the Nuremberg trials.
“It can look like this, and it can happen in secret,” she added, referring to the CIA interrogation program.
Though her group’s research has been ongoing, Dougherty noted that its pace picked up after the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released what became known as the torture report in December 2014.
The CIA’s inspector general appeared quoted in the report as bluntly acknowledging the treatment of detainees as “guinea pigs.”
“I fear there was a misunderstanding,” the inspector general said. “OIG [Office of Inspector General] did not have in mind doing additional, guinea pig research on human beings.”
For Physicians for Human Rights, that remark contained a glaring admission.