Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, March 28, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Calif. Voters Could Decide|Fate of Daylight Savings

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CN) — California moved closer Thursday to scrapping daylight-saving time in favor of a year-round standard after a proposal hurdled the Senate Appropriations Committee and was cleared for a Senate floor vote.

Assembly Bill 385 by Assemblyman Kansen Chu, D-San Jose, would create a ballot measure for voters to decide whether to remove the biannual time shifts. Golden State voters approved switching to daylight-saving time in 1949, in pursuit of improved worker safety and reducing crime.

Hawaii and parts of Arizona and Indiana are the only states that don't observe daylight-saving time. If California voters approve the time swap, it would need to be cleared by the federal government.

Chu says daylight-saving time can exacerbate public health issues. He points to studies showing that the number of heart attacks, workplace injuries and traffic accidents increase shortly after a time change.

"Daylight-saving time is an institution that has been in place largely without question for more than half a century," Chu said in a statement. "I think we owe it to the general public to be given the opportunity to decide for themselves whether or not it ought to be continued."

First implemented during World War I to save energy, it appears daylight-saving time's usefulness in that regard has run out. Studies conducted in Indiana by National Bureau of Economic Research revealed that Indiana residents pay an additional $9 million per year in energy costs because of daylight-saving time.

So far the bill has received widespread and bipartisan support in the Legislature, and it cleared the Assembly in May unanimously. It faces a final vote in the Senate later this month.

The bill would carry general fund costs up to $500,000 to place it on the 2018 statewide ballot.

It has not been officially opposed by any interest groups.

Follow @@NickCahill_5
Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...